, In a study on French focusing on indefinite DOs, the rate of conformity to DLM is about 70%, with about 53.7% of shifts for heavy NPs, vol.2018

, 182), the average rate of shifted heavy NPs is about 35.1% (for cases with comparable length difference between the two constituents) and can reach 40% when the length difference is the greatest, p.185, 2011.

. Faghiri, we can safely conclude that the magnitude of the DLM effect is smaller in Persian transitive sentences compared to other SOV languages so far investigated. Recall that in their well-powered production experiment manipulating the length of the DO by adding a relative clause, With respect to the relative order between the subject and the object in transitive sentences, based on the available data, 2018.

. 9%-in-basque-;-ros, DLM is reflected much less strongly in German than in English". 40 The authors mention a number of specifics of German to explain this difference. Interestingly, there is one shared property between Persian and German that differentiates both of them from the other languages they are compared with, p.304, 1165.

R. , 2015: 1157) and Japanese (Yamashita & Chang 2001: B49-B50) the canonical order is assumed to be S-IO-DO-V. In French

, Using data from treebanks for each language they calculate average dependency lengths for hypothetical optimized and random linearizations and compare them to the actual average dependency length, References Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, vol.21, pp.435-483

J. E. Arnold, T. Wasow, and A. Losongco-&-ryan-ginstrom, Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering, Language, vol.76, issue.1, pp.28-55, 2000.

R. Baayen, D. J. Harald, M. Davidson-&-douglas, and . Bates, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.59, issue.4, pp.390-412, 2008.

M. Bader and . Häussler, Word order in German: A corpus study, Lingua, vol.120, issue.3, pp.717-762, 2010.

, Faghiri and Samvelian: WO and length effect in SOV Art, vol.86, p.33

D. Bates, M. Maechler-&-ben, and . Bolker, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes, 2012.

O. Behaghel, Beziehungen zwischen umfang und reihenfolge von satzgliedern, Indogermanische Forschungen, vol.25, pp.110-142, 1909.

T. G. Bever, The cognitive basis for linguistic structures, Cognition and language development, pp.277-360, 1970.

J. Bock and . Kathryn, Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation, Psychological Review, vol.89, issue.1, 1982.

J. Bock, E. David, and . Irwin, Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.19, issue.4, pp.90321-90328, 1980.

J. Bock, H. Kathryn, and . Morey, From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft, Psychological Review, vol.99, issue.1, pp.150-171, 1992.

J. Bock, K. Kathryn-&-richard, and . Warren, Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation, Cognition, vol.21, issue.1, pp.47-67, 1985.

J. Bock, . Kathryn-&-willem, and . Levelt, Language production: Grammatical encoding, Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp.945-984, 1994.

G. Bossong, Empirische universalienforschung, vol.14, 1985.

H. P. Branigan, J. Martin, . Pickering-&-mikihiro, and . Tanaka, Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production, Lingua, vol.118, issue.2, pp.172-189, 2008.

J. Bresnan and A. Cueni, Predicting the dative alternation, Cognitive foundations of interpretation, pp.69-94, 2007.

F. Chang, Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.61, issue.3, pp.374-397, 2009.

H. Choi, Length and order: A corpus study of Korean dative-accusative construction, Discourse and Cognition, vol.14, issue.3, pp.207-227, 2007.

H. Dennison and . Yoon, Universal versus language-specific conceptual effects on shifted word-order production in Korean: Evidence from bilinguals, Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Hawaii at Manoa, vol.39, issue.2, pp.1-16, 2008.

. De-smedt and . Koenraad, Parallelism in incremental sentence generation, Parallel natural language processing, pp.421-447, 1994.

D. Smedt and K. Kempen, Incremental sentence production, self-correction and coordination, Natural language generation (NATO ASI Series), vol.135, pp.365-376, 1987.

G. Dimmendaal, Historical linguistics and the comparative study of African languages, 2011.

A. Drummond, Ibex farm (free hosting for Internet-based experiments), vol.86, p.33, 2013.

P. Faghiri, La variation de l'ordre des constituants dans le domaine préverbal en persan: approche empirique, 2016.

P. Faghiri and . Thuilier, Ordre des compléments postverbaux en francais: poids et accessibilité discursive, SHS web of conferences (6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2018.

P. Faghiri and . Samvelian, Constituent ordering in Persian and the weight factor, Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 10, pp.215-232, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01131198

P. Faghiri and . Samvelian, How much structure is needed: The case of the Persian VP, Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, pp.236-254, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01429403

P. Faghiri, P. Samvelian-&-barbara, and . Hemforth, Accessibility and word order: The case of ditransitive constructions in Persian, Proceedings of HPSG 2014, pp.217-237, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01131190

P. Faghiri, P. Samvelian-&-barbara, and . Hemforth, Is there a canonical order in Persian ditransitive constructions? Corpus based and experimental studies, Ditransitive constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective, pp.165-185, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01614313

F. Ferreira, Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.33, issue.6, pp.715-736, 1994.

V. S. Ferreira and . Hiromi-yoshita, Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.32, issue.6, pp.669-692, 2003.

L. &. Frazier, D. Janet, and . Fodor, The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model, Cognition, vol.6, issue.4, pp.90002-90003, 1978.

R. Futrell and K. Mahowald-&-edward-gibson, Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.112, issue.33, pp.10336-10341, 2015.

M. F. Garrett, Levels of processing in sentence production, Speech and talk, vol.1, pp.177-220, 1980.

E. Gibson, Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies, Cognition, vol.68, issue.1, pp.34-35, 1998.

E. Gibson, Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, pp.94-126, 2000.

D. Gildea and . Temperley, Do grammars minimize dependency length? Cognitive, Science, vol.34, issue.2, pp.286-310, 2010.

S. Gries and . Th, Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.1-27, 2003.

R. &. Grieve, J. Roger, and . Wales, Faghiri and Samvelian: WO and length effect in SOV Art, British Journal of Psychology, vol.64, issue.2, pp.31-33, 1973.

H. Liu, C. Xu, and &. Liang, Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages, Physics of Life Reviews, vol.21, pp.171-193, 2017.

J. A. Hawkins, A parsing theory of word order universals, Linguistics Inquiry, vol.21, issue.2, pp.223-261, 1990.

J. A. Hawkins, A performance theory of order and constituency, 1994.

J. A. Hawkins, Efficiency and complexity in grammars, 2004.

J. A. Hawkins, Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it, New Ideas in Psychology, vol.25, issue.2, pp.87-107, 2007.

J. A. Hawkins, Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency, 2014.

H. Karimi and . Ferreira, Informativity renders a referent more accessible: Evidence from eyetracking, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.23, issue.2, pp.507-525, 2016.

G. Kempen and . Hoenkamp, An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation, Cognitive Science, vol.11, issue.2, pp.201-258, 1987.

G. Kempen and . Harbusch, Word order scrambling as a consequence of incremental sentence production, Mediating between concepts and grammar, pp.141-64, 2003.

G. Kempen and . Harbusch, A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment, Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, pp.173-181, 2004.

J. Kimball, Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language, Cognition, vol.2, issue.1, pp.15-47, 1973.

W. J. Levelt, Speaking: From intention to articulation, natural-language processing, 1989.

. Lohse, J. A. Barbara, and . Hawkins-&-thomas-wasow, Domain minimization in English verb-particle constructions, Language, vol.80, issue.2, pp.238-261, 2004.

R. Melnick and . Jeffrey, Consistency in variation: On the provenance of End-Weight, 2017.

C. Osgood, &. J. Egerton, and . Bock, Salience and sentencing: Some production principles, Sentence production: Developments in research and theory, pp.89-140, 1977.

. Prat-sala, &. Mercè, P. Holly, and . Branigan, Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.42, issue.2, pp.168-182, 2000.

R. Quirk and S. Greenbaum, A grammar of contemporary English, Geoffrey Neil Leech, 1972.

. R-core-team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.

. Rasekh-mahand, M. Mohammad, . Alizadeh-sahraie-&-raheleh, and . Izadifar, A corpus-based analysis of relative clause extraposition in Persian, 2016.

, Faghiri and Samvelian: WO and length effect in SOV Art, vol.86, p.33

I. Ros and M. Santesteban, Aiming at shorter dependencies: the role of agreement morphology. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, vol.30, pp.1156-1174, 2015.

P. Samvelian, Specific features of Persian syntax. The Ez?fe Construction, Differential Object Marking and Complex Predicates, pp.226-269, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01614243

L. M. Stallings, C. Maryellen, and . Macdonald, It's not just the "heavy NP": relative phrase length modulates the production of heavy-NP shift, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.40, issue.3, pp.177-187, 2011.

L. M. Stallings, C. Maryellen, G. Macdonald-&-padraig, and . O'seaghdha, Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.39, issue.3, pp.392-417, 1998.

K. &. Tachihara and A. E. Goldberg, Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples names in English and Japanese, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.1, 2020.

M. N. Tanaka, P. Holly, J. F. Branigan, J. Mclean-&-martin, and . Pickering, Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.65, issue.3, 2011.

D. Temperley, Minimization of dependency length in written English, Cognition, vol.105, issue.2, pp.300-333, 2007.

D. Temperley and . Gildea, Minimizing syntactic dependency lengths: Typological/cognitive universal?, Annual Review of Linguistics, vol.4, issue.1, pp.67-80, 2018.

T. Wasow, Remarks on grammatical weight, Language Variation and Change, vol.9, issue.1, pp.81-105, 1997.

T. Wasow, Postverbal behavior, 2002.

T. Wasow, The appeal of the PDC program, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.4, issue.236, 2013.

H. Yamashita and . Chang, Long before short" preference in the production of a head-final language, B45-B55, vol.81, pp.121-125, 2001.

H. Yamashita and . Chang, The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, pp.291-297, 2006.

Y. Yao, NP weight effects in word order variation in Mandarin Chinese, Lingua Sinica, vol.4, issue.1, 2018.

Z. Liu, Quantifying structural and lexical constraints in PP ordering typology, Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, vol.2, issue.1, pp.306-309, 2019.